Impact from Elsevier
Step 1 of 7 — About you
Your region

We'll use this to send you your Impact Snapshot results.

Your most pressing challenge right now
Strategize
We have a clearly documented set of strategic priorities that guides where we invest and, just as importantly, where we do not.

Where should we focus, invest, and differentiate?

We can confidently identify the areas where our institution is distinctive from peer institutions
Our resource allocation decisions are informed by trusted evidence and benchmarking, rather than by history or internal negotiation
We regularly test our strategy against external trends, funder priorities, and the moves of comparable institutions.
Collaborate
We take an intentional approach to partnerships and networks, rather than relying on relationships built case by case.

Who should we collaborate and partner with?

When we need them, we can identify and engage the right people, partners, and networks across academia, industry, government, and community.
We are confident that our partnerships genuinely build our capability, whether through expertise, capacity, knowledge exchange, interdisciplinary reach, or funding.
We can see and evidence the value our partnerships and networks generate.
Operate
We have a clear plan for digital transformation and the responsible adoption of AI across the institution.

How do we run efficiently, sustainably, and digitally transform?

Our core administrative processes, including hiring, reviews, promotions, reporting, and award management, run efficiently and without excessive manual effort.
Our staff spend more of their time on mission-critical work than on administrative burden.
We can produce accurate institutional reporting for regulators and funders without repeated manual data-wrangling.
Promote
We can evidence our societal and economic impact, not only our research outputs and rankings.

How do we showcase excellence and impact to build reputation?

We are confident that our external reputation reflects the true quality and breadth of our work.
We take a deliberate, proactive approach to rankings, rather than reacting to results after they are published.
We can tell a coherent, evidence-backed institutional story to government, funders, and prospective students.
Evaluate
We trust the quality and consistency of our institutional data enough to make major decisions on it.

How do we measure, learn, and adapt? The point the cycle starts from.

We can measure progress against our strategic goals with clear metrics and evidence.
When circumstances change, we can adapt our plans quickly, because we can see what is and is not working.
Leadership, faculties, and professional services draw on a shared evidence base, rather than competing versions of the truth.

By submitting this form you agree to Elsevier sending you the result of this assessment by email.

Please complete the required fields on this page before continuing.